Lavalys Discussion Forum: +12V voltage reading error (Jetway J2NC94) - Lavalys Discussion Forum

Jump to content

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

+12V voltage reading error (Jetway J2NC94) [ bug fixed ]

#1 User is offline   naurto

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: 05-August 09

Posted 05 October 2009 - 09:41 AM

Hi Fiery, It's me again.
I have another Jetway's main board H/W sensor issue which model name: J2NC94. This board cannot be identified by the everest. The sensor type is fintek F71869. I upload the log data for you.
Thanks for your help.
Jimmy

The information is shown below:
1. sensor
Attached File  sensor.htm (28.62K)
Number of downloads: 6
2. motherboard/motherboard
Attached File  motherboard.htm (26.91K)
Number of downloads: 3
3. motherboard/bios
Attached File  bios.htm (27.04K)
Number of downloads: 2

4.BIOS setup PC health status
Vcore: 1.168 ; NB: 1.048; +5V: 4.961V; +12V: 11.792V; 5VSB: 5.002V; VDIMM: 1.799V; VBAT: 3.280V;
CPU temperature: 29℃; system temperature: 27℃
CPU Fan: 0 rpm; Sfan1: 0; Sfan2: 3957;

Jimmy
Best Regards
0

#2 User is offline   Fiery

  • Lavalys Developer
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Lavalys Moderators
  • Posts: 10,120
  • Joined: 30-July 04

Posted 05 October 2009 - 08:17 PM

Thank you for the dumps. I'm afraid we're gonna need more, and this time, made by the latest beta.

1) So first of all, please upgrade to the following new beta of EVEREST Ultimate Edition:

http://www.lavalys.c...zyaw7kln5qx.zip

2) After upgrading to this new version, make sure to restart Windows to finalize the upgrade.

3) Start the new version, right-click on the bottom status bar of EVEREST main window --> CPU Debug --> CPUID & MSR Dump

4) Then right-click on the bottom status bar of EVEREST main window --> Sensor Debug --> ISA Sensor Dump.

5) Finally, right-click on the bottom status bar of EVEREST main window --> Sensor Debug --> SMBus Dump (Full).

Thank you for your time.


Regards,
Fiery
0

#3 User is offline   naurto

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: 05-August 09

Posted 06 October 2009 - 06:08 AM

Fiery, thanks for your response.

1. CPUID & MSR Dump
Attached File  CPUID.htm (42.72K)
Number of downloads: 3
2. ISA Sensor Dump
Attached File  SENSOR.htm (27.5K)
Number of downloads: 3
3. F71869 is LPC interface without SMBus interface,IO295/296 information is shown below for you
Attached File  IO295.JPG (110.73K)
Number of downloads: 0

Jimmy
Best Regards
0

#4 User is offline   Fiery

  • Lavalys Developer
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Lavalys Moderators
  • Posts: 10,120
  • Joined: 30-July 04

Posted 08 October 2009 - 12:02 AM

Thank you for the dumps. Please upgrade to the latest beta version of EVEREST Ultimate Edition available at:

http://www.lavalys.c...yl2sdx8wgbm.zip

After upgrading to this new version, make sure to restart Windows to finalize the upgrade.

Let me know how it works. Please note that we couldn't figure out all voltage readings, so you won't have them all displayed on the Sensor page in EVEREST. In the case you know someone at Jetway (the manufacturer of the motherboard) who could give you the layout of the sensor registers used on this motherboard, let us know, and we'll further improve the sensor information.


Thanks,
Fiery
0

#5 User is offline   naurto

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: 05-August 09

Posted 09 October 2009 - 04:05 AM

Fiery,
EVEREST still can't dentify F71869 by chip id. F71869 is the same as FINTEK SIO F71862.
For more information,do you need the datasheet of F71869 to get sensor registers?


Jimmy
Best Regards
0

#6 User is offline   Fiery

  • Lavalys Developer
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Lavalys Moderators
  • Posts: 10,120
  • Joined: 30-July 04

Posted 11 October 2009 - 10:51 PM

We've fixed F71869 recognition. Please upgrade to the following new EVEREST beta:

http://www.lavalys.c...fs6dlk1ngwx.zip

After upgrading to this new version, make sure to restart Windows to finalize the upgrade.

Let me know if it helps.


Thanks,
Fiery
0

#7 User is offline   naurto

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: 05-August 09

Posted 13 October 2009 - 11:07 AM

Fiery,
EVEREST can dentify F71869 using the new version. Other voltage and temperature is deteced accuratly except +12V.
The information of sensor is shown below:
Attached File  sensor.htm (36.66K)
Number of downloads: 3

Thanks for your help.


Jimmy
Best Regards
0

#8 User is offline   Fiery

  • Lavalys Developer
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Lavalys Moderators
  • Posts: 10,120
  • Joined: 30-July 04

Posted 13 October 2009 - 11:22 AM

That's normal, since you need to have a valid EVEREST license to see the +12V reading on the Sensor page.

Thanks for the feedback!


Regards,
Fiery
0

#9 User is offline   naurto

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: 05-August 09

Posted 22 October 2009 - 02:46 AM

Fiery,
EVEREST reads 5VSB error on J2NC94.
The information of sensor is shown below:
1.Report
Attached File  Report.htm (38.27K)
Number of downloads: 2
2.Report_computer
Attached File  Report_computer.htm (58.34K)
Number of downloads: 0
3.Report_mainboard
Attached File  Report_mainboard.htm (69.38K)
Number of downloads: 1
4.5VSB error
Attached File  1.PNG (85.05K)
Number of downloads: 0

Thanks for your help.


Jimmy
Best Regards
0

#10 User is offline   Fiery

  • Lavalys Developer
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Lavalys Moderators
  • Posts: 10,120
  • Joined: 30-July 04

Posted 26 October 2009 - 08:03 PM

Thanks for the files, but without having a specification on the sensor registers layout, we cannot further tweak the sensor info for your motherboard :( It simply has too awkward sensor register layout with possibly non-standard voltage ratios used, so we cannot figure out the tweakings we had to apply.
0

#11 User is offline   naurto

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: 05-August 09

Posted 29 October 2009 - 10:12 AM

Fiery,
The file is specification of F71869 for you checking register
Attached File  F71869_V1.5.txt (1.03MB)
Number of downloads: 8
After download please change .txt to rar

Thanks for your help.


Jimmy
Best Regards
0

#12 User is offline   Fiery

  • Lavalys Developer
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Lavalys Moderators
  • Posts: 10,120
  • Joined: 30-July 04

Posted 29 October 2009 - 10:37 AM

View Postnaurto, on 29 October 2009 - 11:12 AM, said:

Fiery,
The file is specification of F71869 for you checking register
Attachment F71869_V1.5.txt
After download please change .txt to rar

Thanks for your help.


Jimmy
Best Regards

Thank you, but that's the spec for the sensor chip that we already have on hand. What's the problem about this motherboard (and quite a few others) is that they use custom ratios for sensor registers. The spec itself says sensor registers 22h to 26h are free to use, but there's no standard about what ratios can be applied on them -- and there's no standard on which register means what voltage rail. It could be straightforward (ratio = 1) to measure a voltage in the range of 0.00V to 2.04V. The ratio could be 2x (ratio = 2) to measure a voltage in the range of 0.00V to 4.08V. And if you need a voltage like +5V or +12V to be measured, you need to use a ratio higher than 2 -- but motherboard manufacturers have no fixed (generic) ratio value to use for those rails. Some manufacturers use ratio = 5.26 for +5V, while others use ratio = 5.7 for +5V, etc. It's all a big mess, and unless you have the actual spec of ratios used on a specific motherboard model, you can only guess the sensor registers layout and the ratios used.
0

#13 User is offline   naurto

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: 05-August 09

Posted 03 November 2009 - 06:09 AM

Fiery,
The ratio used is 2.THE layout is as below
VIN1= VCORE
VIN2= NB1.05V
VIN3= 5VSB *(1/3.7)
VIN4= DDR1.8V *(10/14.7)
VIN5= VCC *(1/3.7)
VIN6= +12V *(1/11)
Thanks for your help.


Jimmy
Best Regards
0

#14 User is offline   Fiery

  • Lavalys Developer
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Lavalys Moderators
  • Posts: 10,120
  • Joined: 30-July 04

Posted 03 November 2009 - 09:42 PM

View Postnaurto, on 03 November 2009 - 07:09 AM, said:

The ratio used is 2.THE layout is as below
VIN1= VCORE
VIN2= NB1.05V
VIN3= 5VSB *(1/3.7)
VIN4= DDR1.8V *(10/14.7)
VIN5= VCC *(1/3.7)
VIN6= +12V *(1/11)

Thank you. Are you sure that list is correct? Comparing that list against the BIOS Setup values you wrote above, this list seems to miss +5V reading.
0

#15 User is offline   naurto

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: 05-August 09

Posted 04 November 2009 - 07:36 AM

Fiery,
VIN5= VCC *(1/3.7),that VCC means +5V

Jimmy
Best Regards
0

#16 User is offline   Fiery

  • Lavalys Developer
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Lavalys Moderators
  • Posts: 10,120
  • Joined: 30-July 04

Posted 04 November 2009 - 11:38 PM

VIN5 cannot be +5V, since using 3.7 ratio on it would mean the similar ratio should be used as for 5VSB. And that would also mean that the relevant register values must be very close to each other -- since they both measure cca. 5.0V. However, as you can see on the screen shot above, VIN3 (5VSB) which is register 0x23 has a value of 0xA9; whereas VIN5 (+5V) which is register 0x25 has a value of 0x76. If you use the 3.7 ratio, 5VSB is calculated as (0xA9)*0.008*3.7 = 5.0024V -- which is fine, but +5V would be (0x76)*0.008*3.7 = 3.4928V -- which is too low and so must be incorrect.

So VIN5 is either not +5V, or the ratio you got is not right. If you try to use a ratio that's common on e.g. MSI motherboards with Fintek sensor chips (*5.26), you get a proper voltage for VIN5: (0x76)*0.008*5.26 = 4.96544V. Which BTW is quite close to the value measured by the BIOS Setup that you quoted above (4.961V).

If it's possible, please clear up the registers layout and the ratios. If you want us to contact Jetway directly to clear up the sensor support for this motherboard, please send me a private message.


Thanks,
Fiery
0

#17 User is offline   naurto

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: 05-August 09

Posted 10 November 2009 - 09:48 AM

Fiery,
1.Report
Attached File  Report.htm (38.5K)
Number of downloads: 0
2.register
Attached File  rw.JPG (93.13K)
Number of downloads: 0

Thanks for your help.


Jimmy
Best Regards
0

#18 User is offline   Fiery

  • Lavalys Developer
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Lavalys Moderators
  • Posts: 10,120
  • Joined: 30-July 04

Posted 13 November 2009 - 09:47 AM

Thank you, but the dump and report wouldn't help about this issue. We need to know the actual registers layout (which register is wired to which voltage rail) with the corresponding voltage calculation ratios used. The list you provided above seems to have a flaw about the +5V rail, as I explained above. If you can fix that information, we can continue improving EVEREST sensor module about your board.
0

#19 User is offline   naurto

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: 05-August 09

Posted 16 November 2009 - 08:50 AM

Fiery,
registers layout is below ,register value is shown as dump above
A. The ratio used is 2.
0x20 : VCC3V
0x27 : VSB
0x28 : VBAT
for example:
VCC3V= index 0x20h *2* 0.008 =0xCEh *2*0.008=3.296V

B. The ratio used is 1
0x21 : VIN1= VCORE
0x22 : VIN2= NB1.05V
0x23 : VIN3= 5VSB *(1/3.7)
0x24 : VIN4= DDR1.8V *(10/14.7)
0x25 : VIN5= VCC *(1/3.7) where VCC=+5V
0x26 : VIN6= +12V *(1/11)
for example:
+5V= index 0x25h *3.7* 0.008 =0xAEh *2*0.008= 5.1504V
+12V= index 0x26h *11* 0.008 =0x88h *2*0.008= 11.968V
VCORE= index 0x21h * 0.008 = 0x83h *2 = 1.078V



Thanks for your help.
Jimmy
Best Regards
0

#20 User is offline   Fiery

  • Lavalys Developer
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Lavalys Moderators
  • Posts: 10,120
  • Joined: 30-July 04

Posted 16 November 2009 - 09:37 AM

Thank you. Can you explain the discrepancies between the 2 register dumps you sent? Register 0x25 is quite different there. Shall I just ignore the first dump and focus on the more recent dump?
0

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users